On 31 May 2005 the Danish Parliament passed two bills into law, L 129 and L 121, each having potentially important international tax consequences. The main impact, of relevance to international business, can be summarised as follows:

This article focuses on the new rules regarding real estate and permanent establishments. However, this is preceded by some brief comments on the ability to file tax returns in a foreign currency.

Filing Tax Returns in a Foreign Currency – Brief Comments

Under this new law the possibility of presenting the taxable income in a currency other than Danish kroner is available to any party obliged to prepare accounts. This can include individuals who conduct a business, as well as companies and commercial foundations.

The taxpayer can choose to use any currency, except that certain publicly listed companies may only choose the functional currency – or Danish kroner.

A different currency can be used in a future year if commercial considerations support such a change.

Note that all currencies other than the chosen currency will of course become “foreign” currencies - including the Danish kroner. Loans to and from the Danish company in such “foreign” currencies will still expose the Danish company to taxation of foreign exchange gains .

Foreign Real Estate and Permanent Establishments – Exempt from Tax

The passing of Bill L 121 introduced two important opportunities. The first relates to foreign real estate, the second foreign branches . The first rule provides for an unconditional exemption from Danish tax on income and capital gains from foreign real estate. Under the second rule, a total exemption from Danish tax on profits of a permanent establishment is available .

Since 1999 the Danish participation exemption has applied to dividend from and gains on sales of shares in foreign companies irrespective of the level of tax and of the activities in those foreign companies, subject only to the CFC rules .

The CFC rules do not apply to real estate investments.

The above describes the rules applicable to investments in foreign companies, i.e. indirect investments. Direct investments in real estate and in the form of a foreign permanent establishment was, however, taxed, with a credit for foreign tax paid. To convert this to exempt dividend income, all that needed to be done was to put the foreign operation into a company , then the participation exemption would apply. That is still the case under the new law. However, the new rules apply similar principles to a direct investments, in foreign real estate and in foreign permanent establishments. As will be seen below, the new rules provide increased opportunities to derive exempt income in Denmark, compared to investing indirectly

The participation exemption rules currently require that the Danish company own 20 per cent of the share capital of the foreign company for at least 12 months in order to obtain the exemption from dividend withholding tax, and three years in order to be able to qualify for the exemption from tax on the gain on sale of shares. The CFC rules also apply.

Under the new rules, the participation exemption law has not changed but the new rules bring direct real estate investments and investments in permanent establishments broadly in line with the participation exemption.

Under the new rules:

the gross income from the foreign real estate or permanent establishment and all related expenses are kept out of the Danish tax base.
any gain on the sale of the real estate or permanent establishment is similarly excluded from the tax base.

One could refer to this as an exemption system or a territoriality system. The Danish system differs from the typical exemption system in that an exemption system would first include the foreign transactions in the tax base and the profit would then be exempted from tax. The new Danish system does not first take the transactions into account. The simple fact that the real estate is non-Danish or that there is a permanent establishment is sufficient for the transactions to be kept out of the Danish tax base, so the label “territoriality system” is probably the most appropriate description; however for convenience, “exemption” will be used here.

The exemption from Danish tax is implemented by way of an amendment to Section 8 of the Company Tax Act, by the addition of a sub-section, sub-section 2. Our unofficial translation of the most pertinent text is as follows:

Section 8. Income and expenses which are attributable to a permanent establishment or to real estate abroad, or in the Faroe Islands or in Greenland, shall not be taken into account in the determination of the taxable income. Income from a permanent establishment and from real estate is income as described in Section 2 & . The first sentence of this sub-section does not apply to international shipping and aircraft operations or to situations where Denmark is given the exclusive right to tax pursuant to a double tax treaty. Notwithstanding the first sentence of this sub-section the company shall be taxable on its positive CFC income where such income would have been covered by Section 32 had the permanent establishment been a foreign company. The principles applicable to the determination of the income of permanent establishments shall be applied in connection with the evaluation of whether CFC income shall be included in the taxable income and in connection with the calculation of the CFC income. Section 32 shall also apply except for sub-section 2, the first sentence of sub-section 7, sub-section 8 and sub-section 13.

Section 32 sets out the Danish CFC rules. This is only relevant to permanent establishment – not to foreign real estate. These only apply if the net income of the foreign branch is significantly of a financial nature and if the tax abroad is significantly lower than the Danish tax that would have applied had it been in Denmark. However, a modification is made in the branch situation – normal permanent establishment rules are applied so that in most cases payments of interest and royalties between the permanent establishment and its Danish head office are ignored in determining whether the foreign branch is a CFC.

Section 2 & specifically refers to the fact that gains on sale of a permanent establishment and of real estate are “income”. Accordingly, a capital gain on the sale of a permanent establishment or of foreign real estate is exempt from Danish tax.

The new rules on real estate have effect for income years commencing on or after 15 December 2004.

Illustration of the real estate exemption

Danish Co exempt from Danish tax on foreign real estate

Illustration of the exempt permanent establishment

Danish Co exempt from tax on foreign permanent establishment income

Implication of the Real Estate Exemption Rule: Examples

The following are some examples of the working of the Danish real estate exemption rule.

UK Real Estate

The new Danish real estate rule can be used tax effectively for investment in UK real estate. If a Danish company is the owner of the real estate in the UK and the real estate is not a part of a permanent establishment of the Danish company, there is no tax on the capital gain on the sale of the real estate under UK domestic law. However, the income from the real estate will be taxed in UK. In any event there will be no tax in Denmark

REITs

REITs may be either a trust or a body corporate, depending on the law of its jurisdiction. If the REIT is tax transparent for Danish tax purposes, the Danish real estate exemption rule will apply and the income from the real estate will be exempt from tax in Denmark. If the REIT would be treated as a body corporate for tax purposes in Denmark, the holdings in the REIT would be treated as holding of shares in the REIT. The Danish participation exemption rules would still exempt the income and capital gains from the shares, however, a 12 month and a 20 per cent ownership test must be satisfied for the dividend to be exempt from tax in Denmark and the three-year holding requirement needs to be met to obtain the exemption from Danish tax on the gains on the sale of shares respectively.

Argentinean Real Estate

Based on the above-explained Danish rule, income and capital gains from Argentinean real estate owned by a Danish company or individual will not be taxed in Denmark. Due to a recent change in law in Argentina that prohibits offshore entities from owning real estate in Argentina, Danish companies are being used for owning Argentinean real estate. .

Portuguese REIFs

A Portuguese REIF will be, in the author’s view, treated as a transparent entity for Danish tax purposes and thus there should be no taxation on the income and capital gains in Denmark.

Tax Haven Real Estate

The Danish real estate exemption rule does not have a “subject to tax” clause. This means that even if the country in which the real estate is situated does not tax the income and capital gain, Denmark will exempt it. Thus, all income and capital gains from properties in tax havens will be exempt from tax also in Denmark.

Conclusion

From the point of view of Danish tax the new rules exempting income from direct ownership of foreign real estate and permanent establishments are more beneficial than in the case of a subsidiary owning the real estate or the permanent establishment, for the following reasons:

1 For the participation exemption to apply to dividends received, at least 20 per cent of the subsidiary must be owned – however, under the new exemption even a fractional ownership interest by the Danish company in the property or permanent establishment will entitle the Danish company to an exemption from tax on the proportional share of the income or capital gain.

2 For the participation exemption to apply to capital gains on the sale of shares, the shares must be held for 3 years. No such requirement exists with respect to the sale of real estate or permanent establishment under the new law.

3 The tax compliance is even simpler than in the case of the participation exemption due to the fact that the real estate or permanent establishment transactions are simply kept out of the Danish company’s tax computations.

4 A direct investment, compared to an investment via a foreign company avoids the costs of setting up and administering that foreign company.

In terms of the choice between a direct and an indirect investment, there are a number of other differences. One of these is that the situs country is very likely to tax the gain on sale, whereas this is far less likely where the Danish company holds the real estate or permanent establishment via a subsidiary and sells the shares in that subsidiary.

In principal the Danish company has the choice of making the investment directly or via a subsidiary; in both cases there would not normally be any Danish tax, but the choice must always be made with due care and with appropriate input from properly experienced professional advisers.

Danish law uses the term “CFC” but not the full expression . The term “CFC” is also used in the new law in connection with the branch exemption, even though it is clear that the branch is not a company.

Ned Shelton is the Managing Partner of Sheltons, the specialist Danish and international tax consulting firm based in Copenhagen. www.Sheltons-tax.dk N.Shelton@Sheltons-tax.dk